The purpose of the plan
The purpose of the joint contingency plan is to ensure there is a consistent and effective response in the event of major disruption to the examination system.
The outcomes of the plan
The overall outcome of the plan is to ensure that the interests of candidates are safeguarded while maintaining the integrity of the examination system and qualification standards.
Qualifications covered by the plan
The qualifications covered by the plan are primarily externally assessed examinations delivered in schools. These include GCSEs.
When the plan would be triggered
The plan would be triggered in the event of a major disruption to the examination system affecting significant numbers of candidates across several awarding organizations.
This could include severe weather, widespread illness, travel disruption, fires, logistical problems or system failures.
Any actions taken will be subject to the advice of the official agencies dealing with the specific circumstances being faced, for example the police, Environment Agency or Health Protection Agency.
Communication
This includes communications between the organizations involved in the response, and communications to stakeholders such as centers, candidates, parents or carers and the public.
Scenario 1 – Disruption of teaching time – a significant number of centres are closed for an extended period
Type of scenario |
Disruption to candidates . |
Impact on |
Teachers, candidates, parents and carers. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that a significant number of centres are closed, and candidates are unable to attend for an extended period during normal teaching or study supported time, interrupting the provision of normal teaching and learning. |
Example of scenario |
Severe flooding closes a significant number of centres in a region. |
Recommended actions |
Where there is disruption to teaching time and students miss teaching and learning, it remains the responsibility of centres to prepare students for examinations as usual using the Parent App and posting relevant teaching materials on the school website and Facebook pages. |
Specific communication |
The centre will communicate with relevant exam boards, parents, carers and students about the potential for disruption to teaching time and plans to address this. Parents will be notified of alternative arrangements through the Parent App, school website & Facebook pages and, if necessary, text message. |
Success criteria |
Students continue to be taught either through an alternative method of learning or at an alternative venue |
Further advice and information |
Guidance on emergency planning, with advice on severe weather, is available from the Department for Education |
3.2 Scenario 2 – Candidates unable to take examinations because of a crisis – centres remain open
Type of scenario |
Disruption to candidates |
Impact on |
School and college staff, teachers, candidates, parents and carers |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that candidates are unable to attend examination centres to take examinations as normal. |
Example of scenario |
A sickness bug means that a number of candidates are not able to attend a centre to take an examination. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that centres: |
Specific communication |
The centre will liaise with relevant awarding organisations at the outset to make them aware of the issue. The centre to communicate with parents, carers and candidates regarding solutions to the issue. Correspondence through the Parent App, school website & Facebook pages and, if necessary, text message. |
Success criteria |
Candidates are able to sit examinations with minimum disruption or additional stress to them. |
Further advice and information |
JCQ’s guidance on special consideration and alternative site arrangements can be accessed through the JCQ website. |
3.3 Scenario 3 – Disruption in the distribution of examination papers
Type of scenario |
Transport or delivery |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff, teachers, candidates |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that there is a disruption to the distribution of examination papers to centres in advance of examinations. |
Example of scenario |
A courier delivers a wrong set of examination papers to a centre. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that awarding organisations: |
Specific communication |
The centre will communicate with specific awarding organisations to organise alternative delivery of papers. |
Success criteria |
Students are able to proceed with taking examinations without having to reschedule examinations. |
Further advice and information |
not applicable |
3.4 Scenario 4 – Disruption to the transportation of completed examination scripts
Type of scenario |
Transport or delivery |
Impact on |
Courier staff, centre staff, awarding organisation staff. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that there is a delay in normal collection arrangements for completed examination scripts |
Example of scenario |
A courier contacts a centre to report a problem about picking up scripts on time. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that centres: - ensure secure storage of completed examination scripts in the school safe until collection of papers. |
Specific communication |
The centre to communicate with relevant awarding organisations at the outset to resolve the issue. |
Success criteria |
Scripts are stored ‘securely’ in line with JCQ guidance in the school safe. Scripts are collected and delivered to awarding organisations with the minimum of delay. |
Further advice and information |
JCQ guidance regarding the ‘secure storage of scripts’ is available on the JCQ website under Instructions for Conducting Examinations 2018-2019 |
3.5 Scenario 5 – Centres are unable to open as normal during the examination period
Type of scenario |
Disruption to centre |
Impact on |
Candidates, teachers, centre staff, parents, carers and awarding organisation staff |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that centres are unable to open as normal for scheduled examinations. |
Example of scenario |
A fire at the centre means that it is closed when examinations are due to take place. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that centres: |
Specific communication |
A centre which is unable to open as normal for examinations must inform each awarding organisation with which examinations are due to be taken as soon as is possible. |
Success criteria |
Students are able to take examinations in alternative venues. |
Further advice and information |
Centres should cover the impact on examinations as part of their general planning for emergencies. |
3.6 Scenario 6 – Assessment evidence is not available to be marked
Type of scenario |
Marking |
Impact on |
Candidates, teachers, school and college staff, parents, carers and awarding organisation staff. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event of large scale damage to, or destruction of, completed examination scripts or assessment evidence before it can be marked. |
Example of scenario |
A fire at the centre destroys completed examination scripts. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that: |
Specific communication |
It is the responsibility of the head of centre to communicate this immediately to the relevant awarding organisation(s) and subsequently to students and their parents or carers. |
Success criteria |
Candidate marks are able to be generated (if possible) from existing assessment materials and predicted grades/mock examinations. |
Further advice and information |
To be sought from the relevant awarding organisation. |
3.7 Scenario 7 – Disruption to the scanning process – where completed examination scripts are being scanned in preparation for on-screen marking
Type of scenario |
Marking |
Impact on |
Scanning centre staff, awarding organisation staff. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that there is disruption to the scanning process. |
Example of scenario |
A scanning centre reports technical problems with scanning machines leading to delays. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that awarding organisations: |
Specific communication |
None |
Success criteria |
Deadlines for marking schedules are met. |
Further advice and information |
To be sought from the relevant awarding organisation. |
3.8 Scenario 8 – Markers unable to mark examination scripts according to marking schedules
Type of scenario |
Marking |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that a significant number of markers are unable to mark examination scripts, resulting in a risk to the delivery of results by scheduled dates. |
Example of scenario |
Significant numbers of markers withdraw from a specific qualification at short notice. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that awarding organisations: |
Specific communication |
None |
Success criteria |
Deadlines for marking schedules are met. |
Further advice and information |
Not applicable |
3.9 Scenario 9 – Difficulty in meeting planned schedule or unable to issue results
Type of scenario |
Issuing results |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff, candidates, parents and carers. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that an awarding organisation (including the case of a single awarding organisation) is unable to meet a planned schedule for issuing results, due to a catastrophic process or systems failure. |
Example of scenario |
A process failure delays both the preparation and issuing of results |
Recommended actions |
If awarding organisations face delays in meeting the planned schedule for issuing results, it is recommended that they: |
Specific communication |
Awarding organisation(s) to brief schools and colleges about potential delays to issuing results. |
Success criteria |
Deadlines for issuing results to candidates are met. |
Further advice and information |
Not applicable |
3.10 Scenario 10 – Awarding organisations unable to issue accurate results
Type of scenario |
Issuing results |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff, school and college staff, candidates, parents and carers. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that a catastrophic system error, failure or attack on systems means a significant number of results cannot be validated as accurate, or are issued and found to be inaccurate. |
Example of scenario |
An IT system failure impacts upon the accuracy of results. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that awarding organisations: |
Specific communication |
Awarding organisations to inform schools, colleges and candidates of any incorrect results. |
Success criteria |
Results are revalidated or reissued in a timely way for candidates. |
Further advice and information |
Not applicable |
3.11 Scenario 11 – Centres are unable to distribute results as normal
Type of scenario |
Issuing results |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff, school and college staff, candidates, parents and carers. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that schools or colleges are unable to access or manage the distribution of results to candidates. |
Example of scenario |
A school or college is closed and therefore candidates are not able to visit to find out their results. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that schools and colleges: |
Specific communication |
Centres to contact awarding organisations about alternative options. |
Success criteria |
Candidates receive results. |
Further advice and information |
Not applicable |
3.12 Scenario 12 – Awarding organizations are unable to offer post results services
Type of scenario |
Post results services |
Impact on |
Awarding organisation staff, centre staff, candidates, parents and carers. |
When to implement the plan |
In the event that awarding organisations are not able to provide post results services, with centres and candidates unable to access services such as enquiries about results and appeals. |
Example of scenario |
A systems failure shuts down an awarding organisation’s online post results service. |
Recommended actions |
It is recommended that awarding organisations: |
Specific communication |
Awarding organisations inform centres about the implications of not providing this service. |
Success criteria |
Candidates are offered a post results service using alternative methods. |
Further advice and information |
Not applicable |
Awarding organisations are responsible for: |
Examination centres are responsible for: |
Offering advice regarding communication with candidates, parents and carers |
Communicating with candidates, parents and carers. |
Preparing plans for any disruption to exams as part of general emergency planning. |
|
Ensuring centres receive examination materials for scheduled examinations |
Preparing candidates for examinations. |
Ensuring examinations and assessments are taken under the conditions prescribed by awarding bodies. organisations |
|
Ensuring, where relevant, that assessment materials and candidate work are stored under secure conditions. |
|
Deciding whether the centre can open for examinations as scheduled and informing relevant awarding organisations if the centre is unable to open. |
|
Advising centres on possible alternative examination arrangements and declining or approving proposals for alternative examination arrangements |
Exploring the opportunities for alternative arrangements if the centre cannot open for examinations and agreeing such arrangements with the awarding organisations. |
Evaluating and declining or approving requests for special consideration |
Judging whether candidates meet the requirements for special consideration as a result of any disruption and submitting these requests to the relevant awarding organisations. |
Assessing and liaising with awarding organisations in the event of disruption to the transportation of papers. |
|
Marking, moderating and grading candidate work |
|
Issuing results to centres on scheduled dates |
The distribution of examination results to candidates. |
Advising UCAS and CAO about any delays that may impact on their deadlines |
|
Making a post results service available |
Offering a post results service. |